Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

»ó¾ÇÀüµ¹ÀÇ Ä¡·á¸¦ À§ÇÑ »ó¾Ç ÈĹæÀ̵¿ÀÇ ¾ÈÁ¤¼º ¹× °í·Á»çÇ×

Stability and Considerations of Total Maxillary Setback Le Fort I Osteotomy for the Correction of Maxillary Protrusion

ÀÌÀç¿­, À±»ó¿ë, Ȳ´ë¼®, ±è¿ëÀÏ,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
ÀÌÀç¿­ ( Lee Jae-Yeol ) - ºÎ»ê´ëÇб³ Ä¡ÀÇÇÐÀü¹®´ëÇпø ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç
À±»ó¿ë ( Yoon Sang-Yong ) - ºÎ»ê´ëÇб³ Ä¡ÀÇÇÐÀü¹®´ëÇпø ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç
Ȳ´ë¼® ( Hwang Dae-Seok ) - ºÎ»ê´ëÇб³ Ä¡ÀÇÇÐÀü¹®´ëÇпø ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç
±è¿ëÀÏ ( Kim Yong-Il ) - ºÎ»ê´ëÇб³ Ä¡ÀÇÇÐÀü¹®´ëÇпø ±³Á¤Çб³½Ç

Abstract


Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the stability of the total setback of maxilla. It also discussed the surgical considerations of the procedure.

Methods: The study consisted of 15 patients (mean age, $25.53{\pm}5.71$ ¼ö½Ä À̹ÌÁö) who were treated with total setback Le Fort I osteotomy (with or without additional posterior maxillary impaction). The cone beam computed tomography was obtained before surgery (T0), 3~4 days after surgery (T1), and 6 months after surgery (T2). The surgical changes as well as the relapse of reference points in relation to the reference planes were statistically analyzed.

Results: The mean maxillary setback was 2.35 mm. There were posterior movements of A-point ($0.73{\pm}0.83$ ¼ö½Ä À̹ÌÁö mm) during T2-T1. An opening of the nasolabial angle (mean $12.58^{\circ}$ ¼ö½Ä À̹ÌÁö) was noted.
Conclusion:Total maxillary setback allows combining satisfactory functional and cosmetic results for a number of carefully selected patients.

Å°¿öµå

Cone-beam computed tomography;Le Fort osteotomy

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed